- From: Sander Tekelenburg <tekelenb@euronet.nl>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:50:03 +0100
At 08:22 +0000 UTC, on 2007-03-06, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > Sander Tekelenburg wrote: [...] [<http://webrepair.org/02strategy/02certification/01requirements.php#req20>] > Well, that makes some sense for block elements, but less for inline > elements. Agreed. [...] > it would be good to think of a how > to systematize resilient identifiers so that content can be added and > deleted without a) running out of identifiers or b) fragments being > misindentified. Good point. But for an automated web publishing system it shouldn't be that hard to ensure generating new IDs -- not reusing old ones. <http://webrepair.org/02strategy/02certification/01requirements.php#req20> updated to accordingly. >> Btw, browser authors could contribute to adoption of such a practice by >> making it easy for users to find such IDs. One implementation might be to, >> through the contextual menu, place a link with fragment identifier to that >> specific section on the clipboard. > > FWIW, HyperTextuality extension does this Excelent! :) -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 01:50:03 UTC