- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:03:49 -0500
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > Associating the cite attribute with the <cite> element is certainly > better than having no association between quotations and the <cite> > element at all. > > However, I do think it would make more sense to have a different > attribute ("citeref"?) for linking to citations as opposed to linking to > sources. One reason for this is that user agents will struggle to > differentiate citation sources from referenced citations, which will > make actually exposing the information or processing it much harder. For > example, with a source you can verify a quotation, but not with a > citation alone (unless the citation itself /unambiguously/ links to a > source). And while you might wish to show a citation in a popup, you > probably don't want to expose a source that way. > > If the idea is to move all actual citation data into <cite> elements and > simply refer each quotation to a <cite> element, there will be a huge > amount of visual repetition in documents which cite different parts > (e.g. different pages) of the same source, since each new <cite> from a > different part will require the full set of data if it is to be > machine-processable. Unless we work out a way for <cite> elements to > reference other <cite> elements. Which sounds more complex than having > UAs extract citation data from a URI in the first place. I agree with your argument, not just because of your arguments above, but because I can see situations where you might have multiple <q> and <blockquote> elements referring to the same <cite> element but having different values for |cite|. For instance, you might provide a URL in |cite| to a specific paragraph in a book, but |citeref| may point to a <cite> element that only contains the title of the book. Another issue is deprecation. If you overload |cite|, it becomes harder to deprecate |cite| for the kind of direct citation in HTML 4.01 (although I don't yet see that happening).
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 04:03:49 UTC