- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:19:37 -0500
Elliotte Harold wrote: > Brad Fults wrote: > >> Looks useful and reasonable to me, though I'd drop the superfluous >> hash (#) in the |cite| attribute. Then it would be more akin to |for| >> from <label>. > > Do you assume cites are always in the same document or not? If yes, then > you can drop the # and this becomes an IDREF. If no, then you keep it > and this is a URL. We need to maintain backwards compatibility. Existing content needs to be supported. Therefore, I vote no.
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 15:19:37 UTC