W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2007

[whatwg] <cite> versus |cite|

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:57:36 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tl6zeaej64w2qv@id-c0020>
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:12:37 +0100, Matthew Raymond  
<mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
>    Well, first of all, it doesn't cover cases without hyperlinks:
>
> | <p><q>Blah</q>, said Baz</p>

I don't think that case is very interesting.


> [...]
>
> As for |source| versus |cite|, I see two problems. First is that the
> attributes are so similar that they could get easily confused. Second is
> that "source" is essentially the long form of "src", which may cause
> even more confusion:

So name it something else. "linkedfrom" was at one point suggested on IRC.


> [...]


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 02:57:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC