- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:57:36 +0100
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:12:37 +0100, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > Well, first of all, it doesn't cover cases without hyperlinks: > > | <p><q>Blah</q>, said Baz</p> I don't think that case is very interesting. > [...] > > As for |source| versus |cite|, I see two problems. First is that the > attributes are so similar that they could get easily confused. Second is > that "source" is essentially the long form of "src", which may cause > even more confusion: So name it something else. "linkedfrom" was at one point suggested on IRC. > [...] -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 02:57:36 UTC