- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:07, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > Semantics aren't really well covered either. > > It doesn't matter much. It is rather clear that the ruby markup is > intended for a particular Chinese and Japanese typographical device. Sorry for the confusion. By semantics I meant what should happen for DOMs like: <p> ... <rp> ... </rp> ... </p> <p> ... <rb> ... <rt> ... </rt> </rb> </p> <p> ... <ruby> ... </ruby> </p> <p> ... <ruby> ... <rb> ... <rp> ... <rt> ... <rt> </rp> </rb> </ruby> </p> ...etc. What would those "mean"? What would they be displayed as? I mean, sure, they're non-conformant, but what should UAs do? The specs on Ruby currently at the W3C (both for CSS and for XHTML) are woefully inadequate in terms of describing error handling rules right now. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:03:14 UTC