W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2007

[whatwg] Presentational safety valves

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701042259510.4611@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:07, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> 
> > Semantics aren't really well covered either.
> 
> It doesn't matter much. It is rather clear that the ruby markup is 
> intended for a particular Chinese and Japanese typographical device.

Sorry for the confusion. By semantics I meant what should happen for DOMs 
like:

   <p> ... <rp> ... </rp> ... </p>

   <p> ... <rb> ... <rt> ... </rt> </rb> </p>

   <p> ... <ruby> ... </ruby> </p>

   <p> ... <ruby> ... <rb> ... <rp> ... <rt> ... <rt> </rp> </rb> </ruby> </p>

...etc. What would those "mean"? What would they be displayed as? I mean, 
sure, they're non-conformant, but what should UAs do?

The specs on Ruby currently at the W3C (both for CSS and for XHTML) are 
woefully inadequate in terms of describing error handling rules right now.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:03:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC