- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:18:59 +0900
David, Le 9 f?vr. 2007 ? 23:30, David Latapie a ?crit : > dl > dd (image) > dt (description) > /dl this is the opposite you should do. Let's say that you have an image which is *really* part of a definition list then dl dt (image) <- dt = Definition term as in the term to be defined. dd (description) <- dd = Definition description as in the explanation of the term. /dl For example, in a school a list of animal images with their definitions image of a fox with the appropriate alt and then the fox description. > Exception is when I have several picture of the same thing > > dl > dd (image 1) > dd (image 2) > dd (image 3) > dt Various steps in the making of coffee > /dl This doesn't exist. dt must be always before dd. You can't do that. A parser would not be able to associate the three dd to the dt. Plus the fact that it is an abuse of dl/dt/dd. The appropriate thing to do is: dl dt Term 1 with 2 definitions dd dd dt Term 2 with 1 definition dd dt Term 3 with 3 definitions dd dd dd /dl Last but not least > (by the way, here, an ordering would be great, but only ol may have > semantic order - except if one consider that hN are semantically order > and using CSS counter make them visually ordered too) It /is/ ordered. Elements of an (XML) tree are ordered (it is one of the differences with graphs.) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 00:18:59 UTC