- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:18:59 +0900
David,
Le 9 f?vr. 2007 ? 23:30, David Latapie a ?crit :
> dl
> dd (image)
> dt (description)
> /dl
this is the opposite you should do.
Let's say that you have an image which is *really* part of a
definition list then
dl
dt (image) <- dt = Definition term as in the term to
be defined.
dd (description) <- dd = Definition description as in the
explanation of the term.
/dl
For example, in a school a list of animal images with their definitions
image of a fox with the appropriate alt
and then the fox description.
> Exception is when I have several picture of the same thing
>
> dl
> dd (image 1)
> dd (image 2)
> dd (image 3)
> dt Various steps in the making of coffee
> /dl
This doesn't exist. dt must be always before dd. You can't do that. A
parser would not be able to associate the three dd to the dt. Plus
the fact that it is an abuse of dl/dt/dd.
The appropriate thing to do is:
dl
dt Term 1 with 2 definitions
dd
dd
dt Term 2 with 1 definition
dd
dt Term 3 with 3 definitions
dd
dd
dd
/dl
Last but not least
> (by the way, here, an ordering would be great, but only ol may have
> semantic order - except if one consider that hN are semantically order
> and using CSS counter make them visually ordered too)
It /is/ ordered. Elements of an (XML) tree are ordered (it is one of
the differences with graphs.)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 00:18:59 UTC