- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:51:49 -0800 (PST)
--- Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > Leons, you forgot to CC the list. > > Leons Petrazickis wrote: > > Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> <m> is for highlighting text that is of some interest to the reader, but > >> it does not alter the meaning of the text itself. > > > > Would you say that <em> is semantic and <m> is presentational, with > > the difference from <span> is in default formatting? Or is "meaning" > > not quite the right word - is <m> like a highlighter in revision > > change tracking, meant to be seen and then discarded? > > No, <m> does have semantics. It marks a specific point of interest, as > you might do with a highlighter, it just doesn't alter the meaning of > the text itself. Isn't this what <strong> is for? I.E. signifying the contained text is somehow more important than the surrounding text but not changing the meaning. | 3.12.5 paragraph 3: "Changing the importance of a | piece of text with the strong element does not change | the meaning of the sentence." > > <m> isn't really needed for revision tracking, we have <ins> and <del> > for that. Though, another use case is that it could be used to mark a > section that needs to be reviewed and/or edited later. That could be > particularly useful collaborative editing, like in a wiki. That's often > what I use the highlighter tool for in MS Word. > > -- > Lachlan Hunt > http://lachy.id.au/ > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:51:49 UTC