[whatwg] The m element

On Feb 7, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:

> On concern that we would be 'wasting' such a short element name for  
> such an esoteric usage, why not call it <mark> instead?

I agree, I think the spec should be hesitant to introduce additional  
single-letter element names.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:55:59 UTC