- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:28:28 +0100
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:03:33 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote: >> The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and even >> <a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for instance, >> the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which claim to be >> XHTML as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all throughout. >> ... > > Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that > problem there. <h5><a name="IDANQDS" id="IDANQDS" />Names and Tokens</h5> is one example... > If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably caused > by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec (which > IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language). In your humble opinion or is it just a fact? :-) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 12:28:28 UTC