- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:26:52 +0100
Anne van Kesteren schrieb: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:03:33 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote: >>> The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and >>> even <a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for >>> instance, the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which >>> claim to be XHTML as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all >>> throughout. >>> ... >> >> Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that >> problem there. > > <h5><a name="IDANQDS" id="IDANQDS" />Names and Tokens</h5> > > is one example... > > >> If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably >> caused by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec >> (which IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language). > > In your humble opinion or is it just a fact? :-) Aha. I thought it was about an "<a />" with no attributes. So yes, that's a bug in the XSLT code (xmlspec.xsl). I'll forward this info to Norman Walsh. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 13:26:52 UTC