Lachlan Hunt schrieb: > ... > The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and even > <a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for instance, > the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which claim to be XHTML > as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all throughout. > ... Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that problem there. If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably caused by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec (which IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language). Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 09:03:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:50 UTC