- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:59:50 -0700
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:51:17 -0700, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: >>> I think "for" should be treated analogously to "form". That would mean >>> that the <label> element is not associated with any control. >> >> Back compat wins this one I think. > > That and what's the point of having a <label> with a control in it > that the <label> is not associated with? I don't know. What's the point again of having a form control inside a form, but not being associated with anything (including the form)? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 06:59:50 UTC