- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:21:44 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:51:17 -0700, Matthew Raymond > <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > I think "for" should be treated analogously to "form". That would mean > > > > that the <label> element is not associated with any control. > > > > > > Back compat wins this one I think. > > > > That and what's the point of having a <label> with a control in it > > that the <label> is not associated with? > > I don't know. What's the point again of having a form control inside a form, > but not being associated with anything (including the form)? Sometimes you need to make elements not be associated with the form, so that they won't be submitted with the form. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 13:21:44 UTC