- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:51:17 -0400
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I think "for" should be treated analogously to "form". That would mean >> that the <label> element is not associated with any control. > > Back compat wins this one I think. That and what's the point of having a <label> with a control in it that the <label> is not associated with?
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 02:51:17 UTC