- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:08:55 +0200
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:49:44 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote: > Quoting ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com>: > >> b) The feature string "XHTML" combined with version string "5.0" >> is to me not very inspired. Simple reason: XHTML 2. What if they >> get to XHTML 5? In my opinion, checking for XHTML 5.0 should *not* >> be available. > > Also, feature "XHTML" with version string "2.0" is already taken, see: > <http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/html.html#ID-1176245063> > > Cheers, > > Anne I was not saying to use feature "XHTML" with version "2.0". I know it's taken, that's why I was suggesting to not use "XHTML" and version "5.0" too. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 08:08:55 UTC