W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2005

[whatwg] 2.2.1. DOM feature strings

From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:08:55 +0200
Message-ID: <op.szvog5ttmapogm@duron.mshome.net>
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:49:44 +0200, Anne van Kesteren  
<fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote:

> Quoting ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com>:
>
>> b) The feature string "XHTML" combined with version string "5.0"
>> is to me  not very inspired. Simple reason: XHTML 2. What if they
>> get to XHTML 5? In  my opinion, checking for XHTML 5.0 should *not*
>> be available.
>
> Also, feature "XHTML" with version string "2.0" is already taken, see:
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/html.html#ID-1176245063>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anne

I was not saying to use feature "XHTML" with version "2.0". I know it's  
taken, that's why I was suggesting to not use "XHTML" and version "5.0"  
too.

-- 
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 08:08:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:43 UTC