W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2005

[whatwg] 2.2.1. DOM feature strings

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:30:26 +0100
Message-ID: <20051107173026.j77qtpv7e00004s8@webmail.annevankesteren.nl>
Quoting ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com>:
>>> b) The feature string "XHTML" combined with version string "5.0"
>>> is to me  not very inspired. Simple reason: XHTML 2. What if they
>>> get to XHTML 5? In  my opinion, checking for XHTML 5.0 should *not*
>>> be available.
>>
>> Also, feature "XHTML" with version string "2.0" is already taken, see:
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/html.html#ID-1176245063>
>
> I was not saying to use feature "XHTML" with version "2.0". I know 
> it's  taken, that's why I was suggesting to not use "XHTML" and 
> version "5.0"  too.

If you knew it was taken why were you referring to XHTML 2 instead of 
DOM Level
2 HTML? Checking for the feature "XHTML" with version "2.0" means that you are
checking if a user agent supporting XHTML 1 also supports the DOM interfaces
defined in DOM Level 2 HTML for it. It has nothing to do with XHTML 2.

Therefore, using "XHTML" and "5.0" should be no problem. Especially since the
HTML WG does not seem to plan to introduce any DOM interfaces for the new
elements...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 08:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:43 UTC