- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:03:01 +0200
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:44:48 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote: > Quoting ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com>: <...> > > Nobody in his right mind would use hasFeature to check for support. It > is merely > there for compatibility and joy. > <...> > > How else can you check if XHTML support is on? Furthermore, XHTML 2 does > not > define DOM interfaces so that should not be a problem. (They're not > planning to > do so either.) > <...> > > Neh. If all goes well the specification will eventually be called HTML 5. > <...> > > Incremental innovation. How do you check which user agent supports > html:canvas? > How do you check which user agent supports the CSS color value "orange"? > You > don't. > > Cheers, > > Anne > > Hehe. Thanks for the reply. So, the hasFeature is ... just a trap for developers. Maybe the WA 1.0 spec should provide more reasons for not using hasFeature, just like you did now. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 08:03:01 UTC