- From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:09:21 +0100
Ian Hickson wrote: > NOTE: Other than the three issues listed in the "Status of this document" > section (the <dataentry> proposal, the question of whether the repetition > model is needed at all, and the div-form-inline content model issue) I am > not aware of any outstanding issues on the WF2 specification. What are the arguments for dropping the repetition model? FWIW I believe that the repetition model is quite useful, and it would be a shame to drop it. Especially combined with data roundtrips (replace=values), it enables an elegant way of editing tabular data. A data grid is an essential component of any UI widget set, and the template based approach in WF2 makes it more powerfull and flexible than most. There might be point in editorially seperating the repetition model spec from the form-related parts of WF2, though. They don't have too many dependencies between them, and it might make both specs clearer and more focused. regards Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 09:09:21 UTC