- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:49:43 +0000 (UTC)
FYI, I just made two changes to the WF2 spec that have been requested multiple times. I had previously objected to making the changes but I was clearly in the minority with my opinions. :-) The type="uri" input type is now type="url", for consistency with CSS. I dropped the various ERROR_* constants. Validity checking is now done only with the |validity| object. I also renamed all its members to be more obvious. For instance, you now say: if (control.validity.valueMissing) ... if (control.validity.tooLong) ... To check if any flags are set you can now do: if (!control.validity.valid) ... Since these changes almost certainly introduced editorial mistakes, we will have one more call for comments (in about a week or two) before the call for implementations goes out. NOTE: Other than the three issues listed in the "Status of this document" section (the <dataentry> proposal, the question of whether the repetition model is needed at all, and the div-form-inline content model issue) I am not aware of any outstanding issues on the WF2 specification. If you are still waiting for a reply to a comment on the WF2 spec, I apologise but it appears I have lost it. (Either that, or I classified it as a WA1 comment or a process comment.) I do not think I lost any, but if you think I have, please resend them if you want to receive a reply. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 05:49:43 UTC