- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-what@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:18:15 +0100
Jim Ley writes: >> XHTML is in fact a very good example. XHTML1 and HTML4 are almost >> identical. Why have virtually no authors switched to XHTML? > because virtually identical and not supported by browsers provides no > motivation to change, exactly the same challenges as WF2 has. Except that WF2 provides an noticable improvement to HTML4, is backward compatible with HTML4, and will be well-supported by browsers. So, actually, nothing like XHTML. Regards, Malcolm
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 12:18:15 UTC