- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:28:40 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote: >> >> Given that Netscape 2.0 has been responsible for a total of 0% of the hits >> on the WHATWG site today, I really don't think that lack of Netscape 2.0 >> compatibility in this demo is of particularily great importance. > > Yes, but there are positively hundreds of user agents that don't > implement getElementsByTagName None of those were in the stats I examined either. In fact every UA in the list that I made when you first mentioned this supports the script. > which is the first thing you use without testing. Please read the clj > faq resource quoted in the other post for a workable approach. I've changed the script to check this and a few other things before going on and doing its work. > Indeed, you can even see it in the example - using IE6 ... then return > to the previous page using the back button, and it says this: > > First date and time: Format: 15/7/4 Oops. Fixed. Thanks for your input! -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 09:28:40 UTC