- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:11:04 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > My UA is irrelevant, any competent scripter uses some same basic > techniques, none of which were prevalent in the example. If you can't > see that that will fail in lots of UA's, you simply shouldn't be > scripting. As far as I can tell, the script in the page in question is fully ECMA-262 compliant, and the DOM is fully W3C DOM2 HTML compliant. If the script errors, it's a UA bug. I would like to know which UA that is, but if you are unwilling to divulge this information, then I'm sure I'll manage to get over my disappointment. > The comp.lang.javascript FAQ is a good place to start if you wish to > learn. I read this document but was unable to find anything relevant. Could you point me to the specific entry you were presumably referring to? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 08:11:04 UTC