W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2004

[whatwg] Regarding rich text editing

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 13:24:50 +0100
Message-ID: <851c8d3104070405244151c654@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:06:11 -0400, Matthew Raymond
<mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Jim Ley wrote:
> > In the resolved WONTFIX sense perhaps?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
> 
>    Perhaps you should read closer:

It says RESOLVED WONTFIX, and whilst it's obvious that bugzilla has
many flaws - surely RESOLVED DUPLICATE newbug, or INVALID would be an
appropriate way to close the bug, saying they WONTFIX the feature
request says that.  Bug Tracking isn't rocket science.

> "However, most of the talented hackers I know dislike bugspam intensely,
> so I'm inclined to close this bug, open another one, and revoke bugzilla
> access from anyone who spams that bug.  How's that for vending a clue, hmm?"

It's rather a depressing state of affairs all round.

>    They haven't closed the issue. They've closed the bug.

>    You may disagree with they way they're handling the spam in this
> bug, but don't misrepresent what's going on here. Mozilla is not opposed
> to addressing this bug. They're just sick of the spam.

So where's the new bug?  Looks like the feature's still closed to me.

Jim.
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2004 05:24:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:35 UTC