- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 13:21:07 +0100
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 12:05:24 +1000, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at iinet.net.au> wrote: > Normally, they wouldn't let us use anything that 90% of their > audience won't get any benefit from either, but if Web Apps, Web Forms > and Web Controls offers a clear benefit over supporting IE, then I think > that situation could change quite rapidly. What are Web Controls offering you - remember 90% don't see anything but the degraded state. (unless you're going to go to your managers and explain how you're going to add the cost of supporting a large script library.) > That's why I don't think the WHATWG should make the > extensions to HTML, rather than just an XHTML module. Why have an XHTML module at all? Jim.
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2004 05:21:07 UTC