- From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:21:59 -0800
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > Well, min max and step apply to all those types, I didn't really want to > have to explicitly mention them each time, so only mention them where they > are mildly important. Would it be better to explicitly mention them for > each different type? I understand the preference against mentioning them every time, but I think mentioning them after the fact makes it confusing. Maybe I missed something, but I didn't see the association until after reading the descriptions of each of the types and several more paragraphs after. It might be better to mention the shared attributes in a single place before all of the type descriptions, so the reader goes in with knowledge of the associations. -- Brad Fults NeatBox
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 15:21:59 UTC