- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Brad Fults wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > Well, min max and step apply to all those types, I didn't really want > > to have to explicitly mention them each time, so only mention them > > where they are mildly important. Would it be better to explicitly > > mention them for each different type? > > I understand the preference against mentioning them every time, but I > think mentioning them after the fact makes it confusing. Maybe I missed > something, but I didn't see the association until after reading the > descriptions of each of the types and several more paragraphs after. > > It might be better to mention the shared attributes in a single place > before all of the type descriptions, so the reader goes in with > knowledge of the associations. Ok, added a paragraph to that effect. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 18:23:11 UTC