W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2004

[whatwg] Syntax Highlighting [was: several messages]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:51:04 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412110158291.4755@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, James Graham wrote:
> Sure. But in this particular case, I happen to think that the overall 
> measure of benefit, which we can parameterise something like: 
> (probability of implementation) * (usefulness of feature if implemented) 
> / (added complexity), is pretty large even if p(implementation) is small 
> because, not only is the feature useful but because the added complexity 
> is almost zero. Therefore,, I think it's worth adding to the spec even 
> at this late stage.

Ok, I've added an "accept" attribute to <textarea>, with no implementation 
requirements and with the semantic that it gives the type of content that 
is expected (as a MIME type).

But don't expect UAs to do anything with it this decade. :-)

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 19:51:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:38 UTC