- From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:04:56 +0000
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:51:04 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, James Graham wrote: > > > > Sure. But in this particular case, I happen to think that the overall > > measure of benefit, which we can parameterise something like: > > (probability of implementation) * (usefulness of feature if implemented) > > / (added complexity), is pretty large even if p(implementation) is small > > because, not only is the feature useful but because the added complexity > > is almost zero. Therefore,, I think it's worth adding to the spec even > > at this late stage. > > Ok, I've added an "accept" attribute to <textarea>, with no implementation > requirements and with the semantic that it gives the type of content that > is expected (as a MIME type). > > But don't expect UAs to do anything with it this decade. :-) how do you expect the feature to be tested in implementations then? Please don't have things you know won't be implemented. Jim.
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2004 02:04:56 UTC