W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-websignage@w3.org > May 2013

Re: To discuss the title, I opend my draft

From: Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:06:14 +0900
To: public-websignage@w3.org
Message-Id: <201305241906.GCF35929.BHTLtUBBJ@kddi.com>
Hi Futomi san,

I am circumspect about defining "Profiles" regardless of "Core".
It may affect what we want to promote web based signage relying on. The core of the profile will 
depend on HTML5 in wide sense if we want to rely on HTML5 in wide sense. But HTML5 in wide sense 
does not seem to be prescribed closely. However, the outline is seen in various places. For example,
 it is suggested on the page of HTML5 Logo of the W3C. *1 Therefore, it will become the important 
requirements that profile of web based signage is based on such things.

On the other hand, we should prescribe original Profile if we do not want to rely on HTML5 in wide 
sense. In addition, I do not like that TV and Mobile and Signage have individual Profile very much. 
Because they may promote fragmentation of the WWW.

I wish one general-purpose not specific use cases oriented Profile called HTML5 in wide sense is 
established first.

*1: http://www.w3.org/html/logo/ 
In this page's class section, the followings are enumerated.
HTML5, RDFa, microdata, microformats, App Cache, Local Storage, Indexed DB, File API, Geolocation 
API, audio/video input, contacts & events, tilt orientation, Web Sockets, Server-Sent Events, Audio,
 video, SVG, Canvas, WebGL, CSS3 3D, Web Workers, XMLHttpRequest 2, CSS3, WOFF



> Hi Satoru,
> Thanks for your comment.
> Responses inline below.
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:07:51 +0900
> Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com> wrote:
> > Hi Futomi san,
> > 
> > Thank you for publication of your hard work.
> > 
> > I read the document. And I understood that the positioning of this document is  the followings 
> > contents for signage player.
> > * Definition of a term and the concept (Or it is the architecture and model.)
> > * Detailed requirements
> Definitely yes.
> As your understanding, the document defines just detailed requirements.
> > I think that this is an important document for this BG.
> > 
> > Now, I consider "Profile" at W3C to be the subsets or collections of individual features and 
> > functions in existing standards. Therefore I thought this document to be different from profile.
> Exactly.
> It seems to be better to change "Profile" to the other term.
> > How about the following titles?
> > "Architecture and Requirements for Web-based Signage Player"
> Sounds nice.
> Thanks for your idea.
> BTW, how do you think "profile" in "Core profile"?
> The term "profile" in "Core profile" means a subset of the documents we are addressing.
> Is it confusing?
> Cheers,
> Futomi
> --
> Newphoria Corporation
> Chief Technology Officer
> Futomi Hatano
> --
> futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp
> http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 10:07:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:23:27 UTC