- From: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:18:44 +0900
- To: Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com>
- Cc: public-websignage@w3.org
Hi Satoru, Thanks for your comment. Responses inline below. On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:07:51 +0900 Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com> wrote: > Hi Futomi san, > > Thank you for publication of your hard work. > > I read the document. And I understood that the positioning of this document is the followings for > contents for signage player. > * Definition of a term and the concept (Or it is the architecture and model.) > * Detailed requirements Definitely yes. As your understanding, the document defines just detailed requirements. > I think that this is an important document for this BG. > > Now, I consider "Profile" at W3C to be the subsets or collections of individual features and > functions in existing standards. Therefore I thought this document to be different from profile. Exactly. It seems to be better to change "Profile" to the other term. > How about the following titles? > "Architecture and Requirements for Web-based Signage Player" Sounds nice. Thanks for your idea. BTW, how do you think "profile" in "Core profile"? The term "profile" in "Core profile" means a subset of the documents we are addressing. Is it confusing? Cheers, Futomi -- Newphoria Corporation Chief Technology Officer Futomi Hatano -- futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 05:18:21 UTC