W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webscreens@w3.org > September 2017

Re: Agenda for Second Screen WG/CG F2F at TPAC

From: François Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:13:12 +0200
To: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Cc: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mlamouri@google.com>, Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
Message-ID: <fdae1e4c-faa9-2674-2653-5c778526f469@w3.org>
Hi Mark,

Le 19/09/2017 à 19:03, mark a. foltz a écrit :
> Thank Anssi for setting this up.  I will take a pass at the agenda shortly.
> 
> One operational issue: the SSWG is chartered through October 31, 
> immediately before TPAC.
> 
> That timeline seems too tight for Presentation API to go to REC; by 
> 10/31 we would need a CfC to go to PR, then follow the PR process, which 
> takes at least 4 weeks if I remember correctly.  Ideally, we (Chrome) 
> would also appreciate extra time to address any issues found through 
> implementation testing (to improve the implementation report).  Also we 
> may decide on a set of features for the level 2 spec.
> 
> For the Remote Playback API, we will need an additional window of time 
> to move it forward and address remaining issues (including interop, 
> <video> feature requirements, and soliciting a second implementation).
> 
> We could ask for a one-month extension on the current charter (to cover 
> TPAC and REC track work on Presentation API v1), then discuss at TPAC 
> the time frame for a revised charter (once we know the amount of work 
> that would be in scope). >
> Thoughts?

Do we have any visibility about potential changes of scope that we might 
want to put into the new charter?

For instance, could any part of the on-going discussions on the Open 
Screen Protocol be ready for standardization by end of year and be worth 
including in scope of the Second Screen WG?

If we know already that this work should rather remain in incubation for 
now, or should rather be standardized elsewhere, then we may want to ask 
for a one-year charter extension directly with limited or no change in 
scope to:

1. push the Presentation API to Recommendation, adjusting the test suite 
and the implementation report as needed;
2. start develop the Presentation API level 2 specification;
3. complete the test suite of the Remote Playback API and solicit a 
second implementation.

If there are good chances that we'll want to adjust the scope of the 
charter, then now is a good time to start the discussion, and we can 
indeed ask for a short 1-2 month charter extension in the meantime.

Francois.

> m.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi 
> <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com <mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Second Screen WG/CG,
>         Mark, Mounir, Chris,
> 
>      > On 14 Sep 2017, at 16.49, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org
>     <mailto:fd@w3.org>> wrote:
>      >
>      > Hello Second Screen WG participants,
>      >
>      > Our next F2F will take place during TPAC in Burlingame,
>     California. Please remember to register for the meeting at:
>      > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2017/
>     <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2017/>
>      >
>      > Other events seem to be taking place around that area during the
>     same week, so note flights and hotels are filling up fast!
> 
>     Now that you all have hopefully registered, it is a good time to
>     look at the F2F agenda.
> 
>     I put up proposed F2F topics to the wiki to start the discussion:
> 
>     https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Meetings/Nov_2017_F2F#Agenda
>     <https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Meetings/Nov_2017_F2F#Agenda>
> 
>     (on mobile, click the topic to expand)
> 
>     Mark - given the Presentation API has had only minor revisions
>     lately, I'd expect most of the F2F time spent on the Open Screen
>     Protocol topics. Feel free to suggest more concrete breakdown of
>     topics for the protocol-level discussions.
> 
>     Mounir, Mark - any topics you'd like to cover for the Remote
>     Playback API in particular? My expectation is we're able to publish
>     the CR before TPAC and as such should discuss the CR feedback
>     received prior to TPAC. The current open issues do not seem to
>     require too much discussion beyond #41 that is pending
>     implementation experience.
> 
>     Chris - does the proposed joint session with the Media and
>     Entertainment IG on Monday afternoon still work for your group? I'd
>     suggest we meet right after lunch, say 2-3pm on Monday. OK?
> 
>     All - please let us know any topics you'd like to see discussed at
>     the F2F that may have been missed. If you haven't yet registered but
>     would like to attend, please do so by 6 October 2017. You can make
>     edits directly to the wiki or simply reply to this mail with your
>     suggestions.
> 
>     Looking forward to another productive Second Screen F2F at TPAC 2017!
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     -Anssi (Second Screen WG Chair)
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2017 18:13:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:23:17 UTC