- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:50:45 +0200
- To: "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
Hi again, Several people I talked to raised the fact that the Presentation API could easily address devices without "screen". A similar comment came up during the Advisory Committee review. The fact is that the notion of screen is not a precise one. In the 2UA case, nothing really mandates the presence of a real screen attached to the second user agent. This is even more the case for application-specific content (provided the controlling browser supports it), where the second device may not support HTML. To that extent, the Presentation API already supports devices without screens. The group has been focusing on scenarios that involve screens and I think that it is a Good Thing. Extending the scope to cover other types of devices could introduce additional requirements that could be hard to address, at least in this iteration of the spec (e.g. the possible need to specify the "type" of device being targeted). So I would rather stick to "screens" to start with. If successful, the working group could always re-charter to extend its scope. I'd like to get your views on the topic though. Is this the general feeling or do you have other views? Thanks, Francois.
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:51:18 UTC