- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 06:35:17 +0000
- To: Dong-Young Lee <dongyoung.lee@lge.com>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- CC: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org>
Hi Dong-Young, All, On 07 May 2014, at 18:09, Dong-Young Lee <dongyoung.lee@lge.com> wrote: > Many thanks to Anssi for drafting the charter. Below are my comments: > >> Alternately, if the second screen device understands some other means of > transmitting a page to display >> and a means of two-way message passing, the second page can be rendered > on the remote device. How and > > How about changing "on the remote device" into "by the remote device”? Updated. >> by which device the second page is rendered is an implementation detail. > The User Agent provides access >> to the known secondary displays it has access to, and the API does not > limit the options to be used as >> secondary displays. > > The meaning of the last sentence is somewhat unclear at the first glance, > especially the latter part. It also seems that "known" and "it has access > to" are redundant. How about rephrasing the last sentence as "The User Agent > provides access to any secondary displays it has access to, regardless of > which device renders the second page.”? Updated as per Dong-Young's suggestion. For details, see: https://github.com/webscreens/charter/commit/ab3ef9a681bb56b836f65f76cba964a9f76ad067 > I also would like to add an example of a multiple UA case to the second > bullet of 2.4. How about adding DIAL or WebRTC? Dong-Young - could you submit a proposal for the Out of Scope section amendment so the group could review it? Thank you for your review and contributions! Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 06:36:45 UTC