- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:50:01 -0700
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "jicheu@yahoo.fr" <jicheu@yahoo.fr>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- CC: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org>
On 2014-05-06 00:46, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: > Hi Jean-Charles, All, > > On 05 May 2014, at 20:00, Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> I would advocate *against* this phase 2. What has been great about this >> CG is its focused scope, and transitioning to a WG with a similar scope >> would help getting it to rec quickly. When the first phase is completed >> the WG could re-charter for this phase 2, but I don't see any point in >> doing this now. Unless I missed something of course :) related to this, section 4.3 of the proposed charter would let this CG work on proposed new deliverables that are not yet ready for the WG. > Jean-Charles - thanks for your feedback. > > The proponents of the work items in scope for Phase 2 should speak up now and provide concrete input to help the group work that part out. Otherwise, the logical thing to do would be to defer the Phase 2 work items for later (that is, leave them out from this Charter) and/or to other groups, where applicable. > > All - please review the Charter, and send any feedback to this list: > > http://webscreens.github.io/charter/ > > Since yesterday’s update, I clarified the Other Deliverables section to set the expectations with regard to testing more clearly: > > http://webscreens.github.io/charter/#other-deliverables > https://github.com/webscreens/charter/commit/3a5b3ffe158b8bcac07f142b47e8fa10adf87a14 > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 15:51:12 UTC