- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 07:46:03 +0000
- To: "jicheu@yahoo.fr" <jicheu@yahoo.fr>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- CC: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org>
Hi Jean-Charles, All, On 05 May 2014, at 20:00, Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr> wrote: > I would advocate *against* this phase 2. What has been great about this > CG is its focused scope, and transitioning to a WG with a similar scope > would help getting it to rec quickly. When the first phase is completed > the WG could re-charter for this phase 2, but I don't see any point in > doing this now. Unless I missed something of course :) Jean-Charles - thanks for your feedback. The proponents of the work items in scope for Phase 2 should speak up now and provide concrete input to help the group work that part out. Otherwise, the logical thing to do would be to defer the Phase 2 work items for later (that is, leave them out from this Charter) and/or to other groups, where applicable. All - please review the Charter, and send any feedback to this list: http://webscreens.github.io/charter/ Since yesterday’s update, I clarified the Other Deliverables section to set the expectations with regard to testing more clearly: http://webscreens.github.io/charter/#other-deliverables https://github.com/webscreens/charter/commit/3a5b3ffe158b8bcac07f142b47e8fa10adf87a14 Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 07:47:34 UTC