On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Bob Lund <B.Lund@cablelabs.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>
> Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 12:10 AM
> To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
> Cc: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <
> public-webscreens@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Finalizing Second Screen Presentation WG draft charter
> Resent-From: <public-webscreens@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 12:11 AM
>
> Bob,
>
> I agree with your point - would more precise wording be:
>
> "In this scenario, a URL to the content to be displayed is sent to the
> secondary display to be rendered there."
>
>
> Yes, this is more clear I think.
>
I went ahead and incorporated this edit into my pull request.
https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/8
m.