Re: Finalizing Second Screen Presentation WG draft charter

From: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com<mailto:mfoltz@google.com>>
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 12:10 AM
To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com<mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>>
Cc: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org<mailto:fd@w3.org>>, "public-webscreens@w3.org<mailto:public-webscreens@w3.org>" <public-webscreens@w3.org<mailto:public-webscreens@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Finalizing Second Screen Presentation WG draft charter
Resent-From: <public-webscreens@w3.org<mailto:public-webscreens@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 12:11 AM

Bob,

I agree with your point - would more precise wording be:

"In this scenario, a URL to the content to be displayed is sent to the secondary display to be rendered there."

Yes, this is more clear I think.


I would consider a URN to be an appropriate generalization of this, but this is just for illustration and not a spec.

Agreed.

Bob

m.



On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:07 PM, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com<mailto:mfoltz@google.com>> wrote:
Anssi,

In an earlier thread it was asked to clarify the phrase "application-specific media."  I took my response from that thread and incorporated it into a pull request.  Please take a look.

https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/8

m.



On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com<mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi All,

On 06 Jun 2014, at 11:49, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org<mailto:fd@w3.org>> wrote:

> Hello participants of the Second Screen Presentation Community Group,
>
> I prepared a few additional updates to finalize the draft charter. These updates mostly address W3C process requirements. They do not affect the scope of the group in particular. Associated pull request:
>  https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/7
>  (see [1] below for a copy of the list of changes)
>
> I also updated the text on interoperability based on remarks from MarkF and MarkW. The updated pull request is at:
>  https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/6
>
> Once merged, these two pull requests create the following draft charter:
>  http://tidoust.github.io/charter/
>
> Let me know if you have any concern with these changes, or remaining concerns with the contents of the draft charter.
>
> If everything looks good, the idea is to move on with WG creation steps mid next week, and ask W3C Management (W3M) for approval of the draft charter. Note that's not the final step as the draft charter would then need to be reviewed by the AC (see [2] for details).

It seems we’ve reached consensus on the changes contained in the two pull requests above, so I merged them. The updated proposed WG Charter is at:

http://webscreens.github.io/charter/

All - if you have any remaining concerns with the proposed WG Charter, please let us know on this list by the mid of this week.

A huge thanks to Francois for helping the group close the open issues and fill in the TBDs. And equally, thanks to all the CG participants who have helped us with the chartering process by reviewing, suggesting improvements.

Thanks,

-Anssi



--
http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay



--
http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay