- From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:10:58 -0700
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "public-webscreens@w3.org" <public-webscreens@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgg+HFamcF2wAefbVYnLNDcAjvsC_OgiVP9yuQpkqghneZ=5w@mail.gmail.com>
Bob, I agree with your point - would more precise wording be: "In this scenario, a URL to the content to be displayed is sent to the secondary display to be rendered there." I would consider a URN to be an appropriate generalization of this, but this is just for illustration and not a spec. m. On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:07 PM, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote: > Anssi, > > In an earlier thread it was asked to clarify the phrase > "application-specific media." I took my response from that thread and > incorporated it into a pull request. Please take a look. > > https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/8 > > m. > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi < > anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> On 06 Jun 2014, at 11:49, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: >> >> > Hello participants of the Second Screen Presentation Community Group, >> > >> > I prepared a few additional updates to finalize the draft charter. >> These updates mostly address W3C process requirements. They do not affect >> the scope of the group in particular. Associated pull request: >> > https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/7 >> > (see [1] below for a copy of the list of changes) >> > >> > I also updated the text on interoperability based on remarks from MarkF >> and MarkW. The updated pull request is at: >> > https://github.com/webscreens/charter/pull/6 >> > >> > Once merged, these two pull requests create the following draft charter: >> > http://tidoust.github.io/charter/ >> > >> > Let me know if you have any concern with these changes, or remaining >> concerns with the contents of the draft charter. >> > >> > If everything looks good, the idea is to move on with WG creation steps >> mid next week, and ask W3C Management (W3M) for approval of the draft >> charter. Note that's not the final step as the draft charter would then >> need to be reviewed by the AC (see [2] for details). >> >> It seems we’ve reached consensus on the changes contained in the two pull >> requests above, so I merged them. The updated proposed WG Charter is at: >> >> http://webscreens.github.io/charter/ >> >> All - if you have any remaining concerns with the proposed WG Charter, >> please let us know on this list by the mid of this week. >> >> A huge thanks to Francois for helping the group close the open issues and >> fill in the TBDs. And equally, thanks to all the CG participants who have >> helped us with the chartering process by reviewing, suggesting improvements. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Anssi >> > > > > -- > http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay > -- http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 06:11:46 UTC