Re: Filtering out non compatible displays (was: Draft of Second Screen Presentation Working Group Charter available)

MarkW, I am happy to help with this, as our project has implemented this
ability for Cast and DIAL.

Anssi, it would be helpful to be specific as to what you expect to be
delivered to the group:

(1) Use cases demonstrating the feature
(2) API proposal or proposals
(3) Interoperability test suites or requirements per earlier thread
(4) Prototype implementations?

m.



On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> On 06 Jun 2014, at 17:30, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
> anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 03 Jun 2014, at 18:46, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The point is that we should not show the user the "cast/fling/present"
> icon at all if there are no suitable screens available.
> >
> > This is a good requirement, but it seems we haven’t yet settled on the
> approach as there are pros and cons for all the approaches discussed so far.
> >
> > ​Sure. I'm glad we agree on the requirement. Do we agree that the API as
> drafted doesn't meet this requirement ? This is the only major problem that
> I see ​with it.
>
> I think this is something the group needs to iterate on and experiment
> with more. The input from the group participants who'd like to see this
> requirement being addressed is critical.
>
> If the group cannot figure out how to solve the requirement the group may
> need to drop it from the spec or defer the feature for later versions of
> the spec, but I think that would be premature at this point. I’m optimistic
> that once we get more concrete feedback e.g. in a form of experimental
> implementations we will get better understanding of the problem space and
> are able to make more informed decision on the issue.
>
> MarkW - would you like to own this "Filtering out non compatible displays”
> issue and drive it forward, propose solutions for the working group to
> evaluate? I think it would be great to have someone looking at this problem
> space in more detail. For example, a concrete first step would be to
> evaluate the existing solutions, and their applicability to the Web.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi




-- 
http://wiki/Main/OnlyCheckEmailTwiceADay

Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 16:09:34 UTC