Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): WebRTC-NV "Low Latency Streaming Use Cases (Section 3.2)

I support the addition of the "low latency streaming" use cases in 
section 3.2.

Note: I think that N15 should be reformulated to be technology agnostic. 
Today it assumes a) that data transport is the important thing to 
control and b) that SCTP heartbeat and RTO values are appropriate controls.

I have filed #91 to track this.


On 1/4/23 01:19, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> This is a Call for Consensus (Cfc) relating to the "Low Latency 
> Streaming" use cases within the WebRTC-NV Use Cases document, Section 3.2.
> 
> The "Game Streaming" use case is described in Section 3.2.1:
> WebRTC Next Version Use Cases (w3c.github.io) 
> <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#game-streaming>
> 
> The "Low Latency Broadcast with Fanout" use case is described in Section 
> 3.2.2:
> WebRTC Next Version Use Cases (w3c.github.io) 
> <https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-nv-use-cases/#auction>
> 
> The GitHub Issues list is here:
> Issues ยท w3c/webrtc-nv-use-cases (github.com) 
> <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-nv-use-cases/issues>
> 
> In response, please state one of the following:
> 
>   * I support addition of the "Low Latency Streaming" uses cases in
>     Section 3.2.
>   * I object to addition of the "Low Latency Streaming" use cases, due
>     to Issues filed in open bug <# number> 
> 
> The CfC will last until midnight Pacific Time on January 16, 2023.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2023 14:00:46 UTC