Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) on Issue 17 of "Region Capture"

CropTarget production should be asynchronous.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:08 AM T H Panton <tim@pi.pe> wrote:

> In my opinion
>
> CropTarget production should * be synchronous
>
> * that’s an rfc2119 style use of ‘should'
>
> T.
>
> > On 12. Jul 2022, at 09:34, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) on Issue 17 of "Region Capture".
> >
> > Section 6.2 of the "Region Capture" specification contains a Note:
> >
> >
> >
> > Issue 17 of "Region Capture" is available here:
> > What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? ·
> Issue #17 · w3c/mediacapture-region · GitHub
> >
> > The Discussion of Issue 17 at the June 23 Virtual Interim is available
> here:
> > WEBRTCWG-2022-06-23 - Google Slides
> >
> > Minutes of the June 23 Virtual Interim are here:
> > https://www.w3.org/2022/06/23-webrtc-minutes.html
> >
> > In replying to this CfC, respondents should indicate one of the
> following:
> >
> > * CropTarget production should be synchronous.
> > * CropTarget production should be asynchronous.
> >
> > The CfC will last until July 26, 2022 at midnight Pacific Time.
> >
> > Bernard
> > For the Chairs
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2022 21:28:48 UTC