- From: Armando Miraglia <armax@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:37:03 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I support removing "onoverconstrained" Cheers, A. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:16 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > A discussion between developers [1] has surfaced that: > > a) After five years in the spec, no browser has implemented > "onoverconstrained" > > b) None of the implementors have found a realistic way to test > "onoverconstrained", even if implemented > > c) Very few developers have said that "onoverconstrained" is critical to > their use cases. > > Given those observations, the chairs are sending out a call for > consensus on removing "ononverconstrained" from the mediacapture-main spec. > > If this achieves consensus, we will merge the PR for removing > "onoverconstrained" [2] after suitable review. > > Please reply to this message, without changing the subject line, with > either: > > * I support removing "onoverconstrained" > > * I oppose removing "onoverconstrained" > > and, if applicable, reasons why. > > If you wish to reply to a response to this message in order to state > your position, remember to explictly include your own position in your > message. > > If you wish to follow up on the thread for any other reason, please > change the subject, so that it is possible to tell responses from > discussion of other matters. > > Harald, for the chairs > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/573 > > [2] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/576 > > -- > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2019 08:42:25 UTC