Re: Call for Consensus: Remove "onoverconstrained" event and track muting

I support removing "onoverconstrained"

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:16 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> A discussion between developers [1] has surfaced that:
>
> a) After five years in the spec, no browser has implemented
> "onoverconstrained"
>
> b) None of the implementors have found a realistic way to test
> "onoverconstrained", even if implemented
>
> c) Very few developers have said that "onoverconstrained" is critical to
> their use cases.
>
> Given those observations, the chairs are sending out a call for
> consensus on removing "ononverconstrained" from the mediacapture-main spec.
>
> If this achieves consensus, we will merge the PR for removing
> "onoverconstrained" [2] after suitable review.
>
> Please reply to this message, without changing the subject line, with
> either:
>
> * I support removing "onoverconstrained"
>
> * I oppose removing "onoverconstrained"
>
> and, if applicable, reasons why.
>
> If you wish to reply to a response to this message in order to state
> your position, remember to explictly include your own position in your
> message.
>
> If you wish to follow up on the thread for any other reason, please
> change the subject, so that it is possible to tell responses from
> discussion of other matters.
>
> Harald, for the chairs
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/573
>
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/576
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2019 08:36:10 UTC