- From: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 22:35:26 +0000
- To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Stefan Håkansson <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACHXSv410=8wM9r_-N=W1yHnEg10tkqrR92veeXCEWjRKSsC7A@mail.gmail.com>
We’d be interested in joining although prefer the meeting decoupled from the IETF. Is there a good reason to couple the interim with the IETF? On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 at 14.30, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: > I think meeting on a weekend would make it much more likely that we'd miss > important participants. Personally, I'd vote strongly against a Sunday > meeting. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:09 AM Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > >> >> I think a 1.5 day meeting on the sat/sun before IETF 102 would make >> sense. >> >> I would like to spend a bunch of the time talking about what is the >> actually functionality we don't have today that we would like to add or >> improve and whiteboard out ways we might do it. >> >> >> >> On Mar 14, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: >> >> I think NV is an important topic and it makes sense to have a f2f meeting >> about it. I'm inclined to say the more time the better (a half day doesn't >> seem like enough). Two days sounds great, but it seems hard to squeeze two >> days into an IETF week(end). >> >> A long time ago, we had f2f interims independent of IETF meetings. Would >> one of those make sense? >> >> I'm fine either way (piggybacking on IETF or not). My main concern would >> be that enough people come that it would be a worthwhile meeting. >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:12 AM Stefan Håkansson LK < >> stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we'd like to know what people feel about arranging a f2f the weekend >>> before IETF 102 in Montreal. (Meaning July 13-14) >>> >>> We've heard wishes to discuss how we should get started on NV, and other >>> topics (like testing, or getting webrtc-pc to PR, for example) could >>> perhaps also be fruitful to discuss. >>> >>> So, would this be a good idea? If so, should it be a >>> half-day/full-day/two-day meeting? What topics should we focus on? >>> >>> All input is welcome! >>> >>> Stefan for the chairs >>> >>> >> -- Founder, CEO, callstats.io http://www.callstats.io Interested in networking, media quality, and diagnostics. We are hiring!: www.callstats.io/jobs/
Received on Friday, 16 March 2018 22:36:04 UTC