W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Getting rid of SDP

From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:34:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxs+s5OxzCVfoKJZAr_FwcuzTWHHsnb8Y6zzENU_aEkDQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Where do things provided by RTCP, such as statistics, notification of lost
frames, new I-frame requests, fit in this proposal?


Roman Shpount

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>

> SDP is really awful - encoding SDP as parsed JSON does not help much. What
> we need to do to greatly simplify things is get rid of SDP. The offer
> answer is really complicated for modern systems that have more uniform
> capabilities so I would like to get rid of offer answer too. To simplify
> all the control, I think one needs to also simplify STUN, TURN, ICE, RTP,
> and SRTP.
> I wrote a draft outlining that - it is at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jennings-dispatch-new-media/
> it is being discussed on the dispatch@ietf.org email list ( you can join
> at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch). Glad to get PR at
> https://github.com/WhatIETF/draft-jennings-dispatch-new-media
> Love to get feedback in general and also on how this, or parts of it,
> would be a good way to go for the next version of WebRTC
> Thanks, Cullen
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 22:35:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:39 UTC