- From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:34:32 -0500
- To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Cc: WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 22:35:00 UTC
Where do things provided by RTCP, such as statistics, notification of lost frames, new I-frame requests, fit in this proposal? Regards, _____________ Roman Shpount On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > > SDP is really awful - encoding SDP as parsed JSON does not help much. What > we need to do to greatly simplify things is get rid of SDP. The offer > answer is really complicated for modern systems that have more uniform > capabilities so I would like to get rid of offer answer too. To simplify > all the control, I think one needs to also simplify STUN, TURN, ICE, RTP, > and SRTP. > > I wrote a draft outlining that - it is at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jennings-dispatch-new-media/ > > it is being discussed on the dispatch@ietf.org email list ( you can join > at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch). Glad to get PR at > https://github.com/WhatIETF/draft-jennings-dispatch-new-media > > Love to get feedback in general and also on how this, or parts of it, > would be a good way to go for the next version of WebRTC > > Thanks, Cullen > > > > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 22:35:00 UTC