- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:32:00 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2017 10:32:39 UTC
+1 to interop with WebRTC-PC +1 to no SDP/RtpTransceiver +1 to constructing and configuring IceTransports, DtlsTransports, RtpSenders, RtpReceivers, and SctpTransports. +1 to adding new transport protocols Other comment: - I think the IceTransport does a good job of representing an ICE agent (for one component of one data stream, using the latest ICEbis terminology). But it needs a few methods, and possibly a separate gatherer object. - We might also want somewhere to stick the cross-RtpSender stuff, like things that relate to a congestion control context. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:30 PM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > I've tried to put together my thinking about what I think we should try > to achieve with WebRTC-NV. > > Chiefly, I've tried to look for the principles: What we should keep on > doing, what we should make it possible to live without, and what we > should extend further. > > I've enclosed it in PDF. It looked prettier that way. Comments can also > be made here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pU4YR0hbH2IhE-s8_CggRdADps_9rambnfsOz3VH_ew/edit?usp=sharing > > Harald > > -- > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2017 10:32:39 UTC