Re: My personal input to the WebRTC-NV discussions

+1 to interop with WebRTC-PC
+1 to no SDP/RtpTransceiver
+1 to constructing and configuring IceTransports, DtlsTransports,
RtpSenders, RtpReceivers, and SctpTransports.
+1 to adding new transport protocols

Other comment:
- I think the IceTransport does a good job of representing an ICE agent
(for one component of one data stream, using the latest ICEbis
terminology).  But it needs a few methods, and possibly a separate gatherer
object.
- We might also want somewhere to stick the cross-RtpSender stuff, like
things that relate to a congestion control context.


On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:30 PM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> I've tried to put together my thinking about what I think we should try
> to achieve with WebRTC-NV.
>
> Chiefly, I've tried to look for the principles: What we should keep on
> doing, what we should make it possible to live without, and what we
> should extend further.
>
> I've enclosed it in PDF. It looked prettier that way. Comments can also
> be made here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pU4YR0hbH2IhE-s8_CggRdADps_9rambnfsOz3VH_ew/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Harald
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>