- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:12:50 +0100
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
[Trying out pinging the list instead of / before raising an issue] Happy new year, everyone! In preparing for the switch from Chrome's nonstandard "getStats" call to the standard, we've found some issues with the changeover, which we think will be reflected in future work on extending the stats model. Namely: - There's no way of figuring out who uses a stats field. This means that we can't tell if it's safe to delete it. - There's no way to add "experimental" stats fields and have them only impact implementations that actively want to use it. If we add a stat, it will show up for everyone. One possibility I've considered is to add API for this - something like this: pc.EnableExperimentalStats("peer-connection", "deeplyStrangeStatistic") .then(function(neededEnabling) { if (neededEnabling) { log('deeplyStrangeStatistic is enabled for experimentation') } else { log('deeplyStrangeStatistic is now part of the spec, stop bothering me') } }) .catch(e => log('Cant enable deeplyStrangeStatistic, platform may not have implemented it') This would allow: - JS to know if the statistic is availble or not - The UA to collect stats on if anyone's using the non-standard statistic - The UA to emit deprecation messages for "going to be deleted" experimental statistics (because there's a JS call that can trigger the deprecation message) Floating this as an idea. Does it make sense to people?
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2017 09:13:25 UTC