- From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:52:20 +0200
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:08, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > > As announced earlier [1] we would like getting WebRTC 1.0 [2] reviewed > now that most of the things we agreed to include for 1.0 during the > Redmond meeting have been incorporated. We would like to use part of the > TPAC sessions to deal with the comments, so please review before TPAC. > > Log the comments/issues etc. you find as github Issues [3], that makes > it easier to handle them than email comments. Of course you are more > than welcome to submit PRs that fix the issues you find! Dear all, I just opened two issues https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/345 https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/346 which are related to the handling of long label/protocol fields for data channels. These issues were found by Peter Titz while implementing a conformance test suite for the WebRTC data channels. I hope this issues can be resolved before the specification is finished. Best regards Michael > > The chairs > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2015Sep/0106.html > [2] http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/ > [3] https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues > > >
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2015 19:52:48 UTC