Re: Virtual Face to Face

My experience using webex for audio calls makes me think it's even more of
a pain.  My experience with it has been very poor.

If there's a system we can use that's large-scale audio + screencast, that
would be better than webex, but actually uses WebRTC so I could just go to
a webpage instead of installing something or calling in via PSTN and
punching numbers, that would be much better.


On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> This seems like a not-great idea. My experience with large-scale video
> conferences is that they are unreliable and generally a PITA. Let's just
> do an audio call if we are doing a virtual interim
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The chairs are giving some thought to having a Virtual F2F sometime in
>> January, where we would be using a online tool for video conferencing,
>> screen sharing and the like.
>>
>> The motivation here stems from rising costs in travel and growing
>> interest from some members to try and at least attempt to have some of the
>> meetings via Virtual F2F / Video conference.
>>
>> The chairs would be interested in hearing feedback from our members with
>> regards to timing, rough agenda and the concept in general.
>>
>> Erik, for the chairs.
>>
>>
>> *Hookflash* <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647 |
>> erik@hookflash.com | @elagerway <http://twitter.com/elagerway>
>>
>
>