My experience using webex for audio calls makes me think it's even more of a pain. My experience with it has been very poor. If there's a system we can use that's large-scale audio + screencast, that would be better than webex, but actually uses WebRTC so I could just go to a webpage instead of installing something or calling in via PSTN and punching numbers, that would be much better. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > This seems like a not-great idea. My experience with large-scale video > conferences is that they are unreliable and generally a PITA. Let's just > do an audio call if we are doing a virtual interim > > -Ekr > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> > wrote: > >> The chairs are giving some thought to having a Virtual F2F sometime in >> January, where we would be using a online tool for video conferencing, >> screen sharing and the like. >> >> The motivation here stems from rising costs in travel and growing >> interest from some members to try and at least attempt to have some of the >> meetings via Virtual F2F / Video conference. >> >> The chairs would be interested in hearing feedback from our members with >> regards to timing, rough agenda and the concept in general. >> >> Erik, for the chairs. >> >> >> *Hookflash* <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647 | >> erik@hookflash.com | @elagerway <http://twitter.com/elagerway> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 00:26:49 UTC