This seems like a not-great idea. My experience with large-scale video conferences is that they are unreliable and generally a PITA. Let's just do an audio call if we are doing a virtual interim -Ekr On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > The chairs are giving some thought to having a Virtual F2F sometime in > January, where we would be using a online tool for video conferencing, > screen sharing and the like. > > The motivation here stems from rising costs in travel and growing interest > from some members to try and at least attempt to have some of the meetings > via Virtual F2F / Video conference. > > The chairs would be interested in hearing feedback from our members with > regards to timing, rough agenda and the concept in general. > > Erik, for the chairs. > > > *Hookflash* <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647 | > erik@hookflash.com | @elagerway <http://twitter.com/elagerway> >Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2015 18:56:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:10 UTC